Gravitational amplification

The phrase “Gravitational amplification” surely has a cool ring to it, but what do we mean with it? We’ll provide some background information and explanation first. Following that, we’ll list some potentially gravity beating ideas that are related to gravitational amplification. Wouldn’t it be cool if such an idea would inspire a future breakthrough?

But let’s not get ahead of ourselves, first things first. According to Oxford’s dictionary, part of the definition of “amplification” is simply: “the act of increasing the strength of something”[1]

That’s easy enough, but what is being amplified?

  • Is gravity amplifying something?
  • Or are we suggesting that something can amplify the gravitational force?
  • Or is gravity amplifying itself?

Let’s tackle this confusion!

Gravity in an amplifying role

Amplification can for example refer to the well-known effect of gravitational lensing. This basically means that the force of gravity can magnify objects in space by bending and focusing light. It works similarly to a magnifying glass.

Magnifying Glass with Planet

The magnifying glass analogy is a bit of an oversimplification, there is a lot more to it. See the references for some websites doing a good job explaining how gravitational lensing works.[2][3]

While “gravitational lensing”, is the term scientists commonly use for this phenomenon, some authors have referred to it as “amplification”[4]. And some even used the phrase “gravitational amplification”[5]. This use of the term matches the title of this article, however, in this article we set out to discuss something else. Magnification via gravitational lensing is super intriguing stuff but what follows has a different focus, no pun intended:)

Gravity being amplified

Now it gets (even more) interesting, as we’ll talk about the amplification of gravitational effects. Boosting gravity, heck, is that even possible? Some authors seem to think it is, and have suggested mechanisms related to the amplification of gravitational waves.[6][7] Such mechanisms though, are not likely something that will affect our daily experience of the world.

Gravitational Waves in a Binary Star System
Artist’s impression: gravitational waves in a binary star system
Andrey VP/Shutterstock

Einstein’s General Relativity theory[8][9] predicted gravitational waves[10] and the LIGO experiment[11] confirmed these in recent years. This was a monumental discovery from a scientific point of view as it opened up a whole new era of observations of our universe. Scientists anticipate many new discoveries based on gravitational wave observations.

However, gravitational waves have nothing to do with gravity as we usually experience it in our daily lives. It requires an incredibly energetic event, such as the merging of 2 black holes, to create measurable gravitational waves. And, it takes super-duper sensitive experiments to even measure the resulting gravitational waves on Earth at all. Therefore, it’s not surprising that you are not likely to ever experience one affecting your body. And please read this funny reference[12] if you don’t want to take our word for it!

Gravitational self-amplification

What is self-amplification?

Allowing ourselves to get somewhat creative with terminology, we understand self-amplification as a self-interaction that results in an amplification of the effect or force under consideration.

Self-interaction

And what is a (gravitational) self-interaction? That’s actually a rather complicated topic[13] but in this case we “simply” mean an interaction of gravity with itself. When considering General Relativity, gravity does indeed interact with itself: gravity generates (a relatively small amount of) additional gravity.[14][15]

Wouldn’t it be cool if there would be a mechanism that would allow gravity to interact with itself, amplifying itself in the process, and resulting in all kinds of unexpected things to happen? This may sound like science fiction, and seem perhaps just as outlandish as something like gravitational cancellation. However, there have been authors suggesting various gravitational self-amplification mechanisms producing measurable large-scale effects.

Some examples

  • Cooperstock & Tieu have suggested there are “non-linear effects” in General Relativity that are relevant for models (galaxy rotation curves) which describe how fast stars and other material in a galaxy rotate around a galaxy’s center. These non-linear effects can be interpreted as gravitational self-interaction or self-amplification. This work has met with a lot of criticism though, which Cooperstock & Tieu then in turn have tried to address.[16]
    Side note: Not convinced that it’s difficult to apply General Relativity to something like a galaxy model? Please check out Ethan Siegel’s explanation, and you’ll realize how difficult the calculations can become![17]
  • Deur is an example of an author who makes rather bold claims about self-interaction effects in General Relativity and the implications of these effects. Among his suggestions are potential explanations for the Tully–Fisher relation, and dark matter and dark energy[18][19] His articles have very few citations by other authors though, in fact most of the citations are by Deur himself. While this is not enough reason to completely dismiss his ideas, it’s usually not a good sign! We should admit that we haven’t dived into his equations and methods used. Anyone feeling up to the challenge though? Feel free to have a go at it and share your thoughts in the comments below🙃
  • Lima & Vanzella have suggested a quantum mechanism induced by gravity, resulting in a runaway effect that produces effects on large scales (instead of only at the quantum level).[20][21]
  • Numerous researchers have published articles about a “gravitational self-force” acting in the extreme environment in close proximity to a black hole, an object with an immense gravitational pull. Some researchers describe measurable effects and there are some review articles on the topic available as well.[22][23]

A word of caution

The above is a somewhat random grab from publications on the topic of gravitational self-amplification, it’s not an exhaustive overview! Please also note that the effects theorized in the above references relate to either very large scales (for example galactic scales) and/or extreme environments such as neutron stars or black holes. Therefore, they are not something that would affect our everyday experience. Also, as always, if these theories turn out to be incorrect they will affect us even less:)

Magnetar: Neutron Star with Strong Magnetic Field
Dramatized illustration of a magnetar, a neutron star with a strong magnetic field
Jurik Peter/Shutterstock

Gravitational (self-)amplification on steroids

And now the million dollar question: can we push a concept related to gravitational amplification to the limit and think of something that might inspire a breakthrough of astronomical proportions?

If we let our creativity run wild, what other mechanisms for gravitational amplification can we imagine? And wouldn’t it be cool if we could somehow leverage such a mechanism to advance in our own battle with gravity? For example, can we launch from the surface of the Earth and fly into space in a way that is somewhat easier than using giant fuel-devouring rockets?

2 wild ideas related to “Gravitational amplification”

Disclaimer concerning these ideas

What follows is a list of ideas related to the article above. The ideas are of a speculative nature and often do not directly relate to existing scientific research. The ideas may sound crazy or may seem in direct conflict with established laws and theories of physics. By listing these ideas we are not claiming that any particular physics theory is wrong. We simply believe in thinking outside the box and sharing wild ideas as a source of inspiration.

Gravitational fields amplifying by being "in phase" or "in resonance"

What if there were a sweet spot for the distance between 2 massive bodies in a disc galaxy such that the gravitational fields of such bodies amplify each other. More specifically, let’s say a central body, like a supermassive black hole, is the source of a gravitational field covering its host galaxy. And further to the edges of the galaxy the supermassive black hole’s gravitational field is amplified by the gravitational fields of other bodies (for example stars, black holes). Such other bodies may orbit the central black hole at a distance so that the fields are “in phase” or perhaps “in resonance” with each other, resulting in gravitational (self-)amplification.

Please note that we refer to “in phase” and “in resonance” here simply as stand-in terms for whatever unknown things might physically be happening if an affect as described would be possible somehow. And for the record, there is no proof for something like that. We are just happily speculating here.

This “right” orbital distance may occur automatically? Either by chance or perhaps via a tendency to orbit at a distance that comes with a lower energy state? (if such orbit indeed would come with a lower energy state somehow, which is pure speculation)

Galaxy rotation curves and gravitational self-amplification

If an amplification mechanism as suggested above would indeed be possible, could it be a way of explaining galaxy rotation curves? In other words, could it explain why galaxies seem to hold on to their stars in the outer layers of such galaxies better than one would expect based on Newton’s gravitational laws? Usually, physicists invoke dark matter to explain galaxy rotation curves. And while that is the leading paradigm it’s worthwhile keeping an open mind and consider other options.

Rotation Curve Spiral Galaxy Messier 33 (Triangulum Galaxy)
Rotation Curve Spiral Galaxy Messier 33
Mario De Leo/Wikimedia Commons[24]

MOND

Modified Newtonian dynamics (MOND)[25][26] attempts, among other things, to explain galaxy rotation curves without invoking dark matter. MOND is certainly not without problems, and has faced plenty of criticism. However, in the spirit of generating new ideas, let’s explore further. Can we match a mechanism of gravitational amplification, as suggested above, with some of MOND’s suggestions? Specifically, can the MOND scaling law (also referred to as Milgrom’s law) be explained by a mechanism of gravitational amplification?

That’s an interesting thought, but we may run into trouble with that as the key ingredient of Milgrom’s law is the (slow) acceleration applicable to the object under consideration. For example, the acceleration a star experiences while orbiting a galaxy’s central black hole. Furthermore, some authors suggest that Milgrom’s law applies to several types of disc galaxies, with different kinds of “mass distribution”. This means that it shouldn’t matter whether most of a galaxy’s mass is near its center or if it’s spread out more equally throughout a galaxy[27]. Thus, if that is the case, can we still reconcile this with an approach that concerns the amplification of gravity?

More wild thoughts, questions, and further speculation

And if a gravitational amplification mechanism via massive bodies being in phase or resonance (or having whatever other connection), were possible at all, how does it work? What physical principles might be behind it? Surely, it would have to deviate from General Relativity?

If a mechanism like this existed, would it only be applicable on very large scales, such as the galactic scale discussed above? Or could it somehow also apply to situations on Earth? Also, would there be any way to benefit from such a principle on Earth and use it to generate liftoff from the Earth’s surface and into space? But how could that be if we are considering an amplification of gravity, while we are actually looking to fight/counter the Earth’s gravity in order to go upwards?

Can an object on Earth, through some unknown principle, be more “in phase” or “in resonance” (or whatever you’d like to call it) with the gravitational field of the Sun? So that the Sun’s (amplified) gravity pulls the object with enough force to result in liftoff from the Earth’s surface and a “free trip” up into space? If defying gravity like that were possible at all, the amplification of the Sun’s gravity would have to be pretty awesome. The Sun’s gravitational pull experienced on Earth’s surface is of course very weak due to the huge distance. Therefore, objects on the Earth’s surface, such as ourselves, experience the Earth’s gravity as being about 1600 times greater than the “Sun’s gravity measured at the Earth’s surface”.[28][29]

How about the opposite of gravitational amplification?

What if the opposite of gravitational amplification were possible? If so, can we use such a mechanism to launch objects into space? We actually have an amazing article on gravitational cancellation which covers these questions.

Comments on “Gravitational amplification”

  1. Avatar for Robert Knipe

    Interested in this subject as a life long MSEE.

  2. Avatar for Robert Knipe

    Musk is looking to technology in this area to achieve his latest goal of Mars travel. Will he live long enough for some help?

    • Avatar for BeatingGravity.com Editor

      We thought Elon Musk aims to use somewhat more conventional technology for his Mars plans, but a scientific breakthrough could certainly help to achieve his ambitious plans, wouldn't that be cool?! Let's hope we all live long enough to see it!

Post your comment

Some guidelines for (math) formatting in comments are available in our FAQ

Please review our privacy and cookie policy for details regarding how we store and process the info you submit.

References

  1. Oxford Learner's Dictionaries - Amplification
    Visit or
  2. Hubblesite.org - Gravitational Lensing
    Visit or
  3. Wikipedia - Gravitational Lens
    Visit or
  4. Schneider, P. (1984). The amplification caused by gravitational bending of light. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 140, 119-124.
    Visit or
  5. Hammer, F., Nottale, L., & Le Fèvre, O. (1986). Overluminosity of distant radiogalaxies-Evolution or gravitational amplification?. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 169, L1-L3.
    Visit or
  6. Grishchuk, L. P. (1974). Amplification of gravitational waves in an isotropic universe. Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz, 67, 825.
    Visit or
  7. Starobinskii, A. A., & Churilov, S. M. (1973). Amplification of electromagnetic and gravitational waves scattered by a rotating black hole. Zh. eksp. teor. Fiz, 65(3), 3-11.
    Visit or
  8. Schutz, B. (1985 - 2022). A first course in general relativity. Cambridge university press.
    Visit or
  9. Wikipedia - Introduction to general relativity
    Visit or
  10. LIGO Caltech - What are gravitational waves?
    Visit or
  11. LIGO Caltech - What is LIGO?
    Visit or
  12. Insider - This is how close you'd have to be to feel a gravitational wave
    Visit or
  13. Deser, S. (1970). Self-interaction and gauge invariance. General Relativity and gravitation, 1(1), 9-18.
    Visit or
  14. Stanford University - Special & General Relativity Questions and Answers
    Visit or
  15. Thorne, K. (2014). The science of Interstellar. WW Norton & Company.
    Visit or
  16. Cooperstock, F. I., & Tieu, S. (2007). Galactic dynamics via general relativity: a compilation and new developments. International Journal of Modern Physics A, 22(13), 2293-2325.
    Visit or
  17. Forbes - This is why scientists will never exactly solve general relativity
    Visit or
  18. Deur, A. (2009). Implications of graviton–graviton interaction to dark matter. Physics Letters B, 676(1-3), 21-24.
    Visit or
  19. Deur, A. (2019). An explanation for dark matter and dark energy consistent with the standard model of particle physics and General Relativity. The European Physical Journal C, 79(10), 1-10.
    Visit or
  20. Phys.org - Gravity might amplify quantum fluctuations, create astrophysical objects
    Visit or
  21. Lima, W. C., & Vanzella, D. A. (2010). Gravity-induced vacuum dominance. Physical review letters, 104(16), 161102.
    Visit or
  22. Barack, L. (2009). Gravitational self-force in extreme mass-ratio inspirals. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 26(21), 213001.
    Visit or
  23. Barack, L., & Pound, A. (2018). Self-force and radiation reaction in general relativity. Reports on Progress in Physics, 82(1), 016904.
    Visit or
  24. Mario De Leo / Wikimedia Commons - Rotation curve of spiral galaxy Messier 33 (Triangulum) - Unmodified
    Visit or
  25. Milgrom, M. (1983). A modification of the Newtonian dynamics as a possible alternative to the hidden mass hypothesis. The Astrophysical Journal, 270, 365-370.
    Visit or
  26. Milgrom, M. (1994). Dynamics with a nonstandard inertia-acceleration relation: An alternative to dark matter in galactic systems. Annals of Physics, 229(2), 384-415.
    Visit or
  27. McGaugh, S. S., & De Blok, W. J. G. (1998). Testing the dark matter hypothesis with low surface brightness galaxies and other evidence. The Astrophysical Journal, 499(1), 41.
    Visit or
  28. Stack Exchange - What Gravity does the Sun affect items with at the distance of 1 AU?
    Visit or
  29. Stack Exchange - How come the Sun's gravity can hold distant planets in orbit, but cannot rip humans off Earth?
    Visit or